Achtung:

Sie haben Javascript deaktiviert!
Sie haben versucht eine Funktion zu nutzen, die nur mit Javascript möglich ist. Um sämtliche Funktionalitäten unserer Internetseite zu nutzen, aktivieren Sie bitte Javascript in Ihrem Browser.

Info-Icon Diese Seite ist nicht in Deutsch verfügbar
Lattice structure tensile specimen manufactured with laser melting (LM) process out of the material H13. Bildinformationen anzeigen
Partner of the DMRC Bildinformationen anzeigen
Partner of the DMRC Bildinformationen anzeigen
Quality control during a Laser Sinter (LS) build job by a researcher of the DMRC Bildinformationen anzeigen
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process during the manufacture of an Ultem 9085 part Bildinformationen anzeigen
Additive manufactured reaction wheel bracket for telecomunication satellites Bildinformationen anzeigen
Employees of the DMRC working with the "freeformer" from Arburg Bildinformationen anzeigen
Tactile measurement of a SLM part with a Coordinatemeasuring machine (CMM) Bildinformationen anzeigen
Powder particles are used as raw material for laser-based additive manufacturing Bildinformationen anzeigen

Lattice structure tensile specimen manufactured with laser melting (LM) process out of the material H13.

Partner of the DMRC

Partner of the DMRC

Quality control during a Laser Sinter (LS) build job by a researcher of the DMRC

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process during the manufacture of an Ultem 9085 part

Additive manufactured reaction wheel bracket for telecomunication satellites

Employees of the DMRC working with the "freeformer" from Arburg

Tactile measurement of a SLM part with a Coordinatemeasuring machine (CMM)

Powder particles are used as raw material for laser-based additive manufacturing

Effect of Defect

Figure 1 Spherical gas porosity
Figure 2 Lack of fusion pores

Aim

The aim is to develop a database of typical defects formed during the DMLM process and to study the effect of these defects on the AM part’s performance. Based on the effect- of-defect studies, defects can then be classified into critical and allowable categories, which will help establish limits for part acceptance for specific operational conditions as well as develop methods to prevent or reduce the critical defects.

Procedure

Specific material and process parameter combination and operating conditions will be selected to constrain the range and complexity of the problem. Nevertheless there is a need for a strategy that can reproduce specific defects (e.g. pores) in the building process while ideally not creating any other types of defects (cracks) to allow an independent evaluation of the effects on the mechanical properties. The state of the art machines already generate high density parts without severe imperfections and therefore defects like cracks or large voids usually do not occur in standard materials like INC 718, AlSi10Mg or Ti6Al4V. For this reason it is not possible to just build samples with the standard parameters but with intentionally inadequate conditions as wrong parameters, powder humidity or oxygen content to analyse the influence of these conditions on the process. After developing the procedure to a specific defect, tensile specimen will be produced and analyzed in a CT-scan, so that the reason of failure might be predicted under real conditions. In addition an investigation of the fracture surface (e.g. SEM, light microscopy) will help to determine the cause of failure. As not only the type and size of a defect is important but also the location in the part. In this case, a catalogue will be filled with these information to allow a precise prediction of the negative effects of defects in AM parts in the future. Additionally to the typical tensile tests, a Charpy impact test will be considered, as defects have a major influence on the notch impact strength, especially with brittle materials. In a first attempt, density cubes will be printed in order to find a method with which the desired types of defects can be specifically generated. If these preliminary tests are satisfactory, tensile specimens will be produced with the parameters and building conditions found. A further examination will introduce the defects locally, in a few layers or a small volume in the tensile specimen, in order to guarantee a defined failure and to be able to consider the distribution as well as the frequency. The printed samples are then examined in the specified manner. The results of the tensile tests, fracture surface analysis and CT scans will be evaluated together in order to establish a connection to the defects and to achieve a systematic characterization of these. Based on the results, a classification of the defects is then attempted, which classifies them into permissible and inadmissible, taking into account the position, the material, etc. of the defect.

Conclusion

The performance and quality of AM parts is significantly influenced by the material characteristics and process parameters. Characterizing defects and their effect on mechanical performance would help address gaps related to acceptance criteria for AM parts.

Acknowledgements

The DMRC would like to thank the NMI – Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tuebingen for taking the pictures of the different pores.

Figure 3 Close-up of lack of fusion pore with unmelted powder particels
Sie interessieren sich für:

Die Universität der Informationsgesellschaft